Statute, regulation, and case-law research drawn from authoritative public sources — Congress, CourtListener, the Library of Congress, FOIA repositories — anchored to the matter you're working on so the answers come back as briefable analysis, not search results.
Legal Research & Analysis is LexGo AI's research engine. Where most legal research tools return a stack of citations and leave it to the attorney to read, summarize, and shape into argument, this module is matter-aware: it knows the parties, the claims, the jurisdiction, and the procedural posture. So the same query produces a research memo grounded in your facts, not a generic precedent dump.
Source data is drawn from authoritative public corpora — federal and state statute, federal regulations, court opinions through CourtListener, legislative history through Library of Congress, and FOIA records — with citations the attorney can verify directly.
The attorney poses a research question — by typing, dictation, or as a follow-up inside an open matter. The module retrieves source material, ranks by jurisdictional and factual relevance to the matter, runs analysis against the matter's facts and claims, and produces a research memo with cited authority, opposing-position acknowledgement, and an explicit confidence statement.
Results can be saved to the matter as a research memo, dropped into a draft brief, or kept as private working notes.
Federal and state statute, regulations, court opinions, legislative history, FOIA records — drawn from primary public sources, not third-party summaries.
Research queries inherit the matter's parties, claims, jurisdiction, and posture — so results are scoped to what's relevant.
Output is a written memo with reasoning and citations — not a list of links. Drop it into a draft brief or save to the matter file.
Every citation links back to the source document on the issuing authority's site — no hallucinated cases, no broken Shepardizing.
Memos surface counterargument and contrary authority, not just supporting law — so you don't get blindsided in the reply brief.
Every analysis includes an explicit confidence statement — what the law clearly says, what's contested, what's a stretch.